Despite recently letting go 200 Chanel employees Karl not only seems optimistic about his business in the economic climate but believes that it is ultimately a good thing because it forces people to aspire and dream to something better in life.
Of course he did it in his Karl way so I could see how people might feel it was a little…insensitive. 

“The economic downturn was needed, he says, it had gone too far. “I see it like a cleaning up – it was too rotten anyway – so it had to be cleaned up…I see it like a healthy thing – horrible but healthy, like some miracle treatment of the world.”
Will it be harder to sell handbags? Or are his products dreams – expensive dreams, to be sure – but dreams to aspire to?
“What is the real world?” he asks. “If you have no dreams, or if you don’t try to improve real life of everybody, people would ask why they get up in the morning…. “I can be interested in a $20m diamond I will never buy, without desiring the diamond. If you want only things you can afford, it’s boring too. It’s great to see things you may not buy – because you don’t have the money – but it is very ugly to think they shouldn’t exist because you can not buy them.”

To an extent I agree with him. But the people who were barely making ends meat during the best of economic times aren’t going to be consoled by the fact that they, at least, have something to “aspire” to. I also have to wonder how much Karl makes from Chanel (and just his earnings from Chanel…he has so many jobs that I know his income is pretty large) and how the recently dismissed employees feel about that. 

https://w.atcontent.com/-/5lp4KVO_RHV/TheBostonista/29C59onk2GU.text/Panel/Autocheck

3 Comments

  1. oh karl. that’s all to be said about the man! xoxo,La C.P.S. Exchanging links would be so lovely! I just added you, darling!

  2. Ha! Thanks for sharing this. I like the ‘What is the real world?’ quote. Perception and dreams are your own reality, but I am not sure if I can make the connection between that and laying of a couple hundred people. Hm.

  3. oh wow. The man is a designing genius, but perhaps a bit insensitive in this case, I agree.

%d bloggers like this: